Int J Sports Med 2012; 33(12): 950-954
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1311593
Physiology & Biochemistry
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Anatomy and Physiology of Hamstring Injury

T. Kumazaki
1   Department of Anatomy and Life Structure, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
,
Y. Ehara
2   Department of Medical Education, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
,
T. Sakai
1   Department of Anatomy and Life Structure, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 29 February 2012

Publication Date:
15 August 2012 (online)

Preview

Abstract

The hamstring muscles were analyzed anatomically and physiologically to clarify the specific reasons for the incidence of muscle strain of the hamstrings. For the anatomical study, hamstring muscles of 13 embalmed cadavers were dissected. For the physiological study, the knee flexor torque and surface electromyographic (EMG) signals were measured during isometric contraction of hamstring muscles in 10 healthy adults. The biceps femoris muscle long head (BF-L) and semimembranosus muscle (SM) had hemi-pennate architecture and their fiber length per total muscle length (FL/TML) was smaller than that of semtendinosus muscle (ST) and biceps femoris muscle short head (BF-S) with other architecture. The decrease of total muscle length per fiber length (ΔTML/FL) was larger in BF-L and SM than in ST and BF-S. The EMG activities at 0° of knee angle were at maximal compared with other knee angles and were of similar level in BF-L, in SM and in ST, whereas they were considerably smaller in BF-S. The EMG at 0° of knee angle activity per physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA) was about 1.6 times greater in BF-L than in SM. These results indicate the highest risk of muscle strain was in BF-L followed by SM.